Infinite Journey - Recent changes [en]

Blog:Optinium

Root — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:54:33 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 17 July 2026
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Then there are tasks or maintenance that you would regret most for not having completed or worked towards when you enter one of the less likely but calamitous futures. These are also absolutely a priority.		Then there are tasks or maintenance that you would regret most for not having completed or worked towards when you enter one of the less likely but calamitous futures. These are also absolutely a priority.

	When you drive somewhere, we cannot say for certain the exact chance you will get into a wreck and die or be hospitalized ot never recover. But there is a frequency by which that future follows from a present in which you go to drive.		When you drive somewhere, we cannot say for certain the exact chance you will get into a wreck and die or be hospitalized to never recover. But there is a frequency by which that future follows from a present in which you go to drive.

	It isn't a if you make it without wrecking, you will never go through the same experience without a wreck, but rather if the chance in actuality is 0.0000001% of realities you will, then this should be considered. However, since in the other 99.9999999% of realities you do not, you should not let the tiny fraction stop you from doing what benefits more futures. Later we can discuss branching this mentally to futures beyond those relative to your current host.		It isn't a if you make it without wrecking, you will never go through the same experience without a wreck, but rather if the chance in actuality is 0.0000001% of realities you will, then this should be considered. However, since in the other 99.9999999% of realities you do not, you should not let the tiny fraction stop you from doing what benefits more futures. Later we can discuss branching this mentally to futures beyond those relative to your current host.

	The point here is to attempt to adjust your actions and planning so that you do what is needed for the maximum number of futures to be better off while still doing what is needed for those less likely and ruinous futures. This can be expanded beyond "what comes next" to more medium and longer term resulting futures based on your current actions.		The point here is to attempt to adjust your actions and planning so that you do what is needed for the maximum number of futures to be better off while still doing what is needed for those less likely and ruinous futures. This can be expanded beyond "what comes next" to more medium and longer term resulting futures based on your current actions.

			I have termed this optimization for all futures '''Optinium''' from the Latin words ''"optimum omnium"'' meaning ''"best of all"''.

Blog:Infinite Me

Root — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:49:17 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 17 July 2026
Line 54:		Line 54:
	Your current existence is shared by infinite others. The moment you recall the shape of Australia, the existences you share exactly shrink to only those that also have the same thought.		Your current existence is shared by infinite others. The moment you recall the shape of Australia, the existences you share exactly shrink to only those that also have the same thought.

	The more unique details you are simultaneously aware of, the less realities that match perfectly. Absolute awareness ~~would be~~ have the least shared realities but still be infinite, just the lowest magnitude of infinity.		The more unique details you are simultaneously aware of, the less realities that match perfectly. Absolute awareness woul have the least shared realities but still be infinite, just the lowest magnitude of infinity.

	The less aware, the more shared realities there are, the more infinite. Meditating to a point of minimal awareness is simultaneously a moment of maximal infinity.		The less aware, the more shared realities there are, the more infinite. Meditating to a point of minimal awareness is simultaneously a moment of maximal infinity.

Blog:Optinium

Root — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:48:08 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 17 July 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\| mode = featured		\| mode = featured
	}}''This discussion builds on the scope and understanding of the infinite present, infinite futures, and the magnitude or frequency by which we experience those futures discussed in [[Blog:Lex_Futuri\|Lex Futuri]].''		}}''This discussion builds on the scope and understanding of the infinite present, infinite futures, and the magnitude or frequency by which we experience those futures discussed in [[Blog:Lex_Futuri\|Lex Futuri]].''

			With the concept of [[Blog:Lex_Futuri\|Lex Futuri]] in mind, one can be aware, to the extent a mind is capable, that there is a mosaic of possible futures and all those that do occur within the [[Ultraverse\|ultraverse]] will be experienced by you eventually and infinitely so in the proportions by which they occur.

			We can use this realization as. a springboard for a personal paradigm shift in how we think about our actions and priorities.

			Most future outcomes can be understood as the "likely" paths. You can expect these to be the futures you will normally find yourself in.

			Performing tasks or maintenance that improves the greatest number of these futures is absolutely a priority.

			Then there are tasks or maintenance that you would regret most for not having completed or worked towards when you enter one of the less likely but calamitous futures. These are also absolutely a priority.

			When you drive somewhere, we cannot say for certain the exact chance you will get into a wreck and die or be hospitalized ot never recover. But there is a frequency by which that future follows from a present in which you go to drive.

			It isn't a if you make it without wrecking, you will never go through the same experience without a wreck, but rather if the chance in actuality is 0.0000001% of realities you will, then this should be considered. However, since in the other 99.9999999% of realities you do not, you should not let the tiny fraction stop you from doing what benefits more futures. Later we can discuss branching this mentally to futures beyond those relative to your current host.

			The point here is to attempt to adjust your actions and planning so that you do what is needed for the maximum number of futures to be better off while still doing what is needed for those less likely and ruinous futures. This can be expanded beyond "what comes next" to more medium and longer term resulting futures based on your current actions.

Blog:Optinium

Root — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:36:26 GMT

Created page with "{{Blog post | title = Optinium | date = 2026-05-01 | authors = Arthur | image = Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg | image_alt = Notre-Dame Basilica in Montreal, Canada. Photo: Diego Delso | description = Choices and planning within infinity | keywords = Infinite_Journey; Infinist; Optinium; Via; Egonaut | mode = featured }}''This discussion builds on the scope and understanding of t..."

New page

{{Blog post
| title = Optinium
| date = 2026-05-01
| authors = [[User:Arthur|Arthur]]
| image = Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg
| image_alt = Notre-Dame Basilica in Montreal, Canada. Photo: Diego Delso
| description = Choices and planning within infinity
| keywords = Infinite_Journey; Infinist; Optinium; Via; Egonaut
| mode = featured
}}''This discussion builds on the scope and understanding of the infinite present, infinite futures, and the magnitude or frequency by which we experience those futures discussed in [[Blog:Lex_Futuri|Lex Futuri]].''

Blog:Lex Futuri

Root — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:23:37 GMT

Blog:Lex Futuri

Root — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:15:48 GMT

Created page with "{{Blog post | title = Lex Futuri | date = 2026-04-01 | authors = Arthur | image = Bartolomeu Velho 1568.jpg | image_alt = Silicon chip under a microscope - Alexander Klepnev | description = Infinite present, infinite futures, and the magnitudes of infinity | keywords = Infinite_Journey; Infinist; Lex_Futuri; Ultraverse; Egonaut; Via | mode = featured }}The present gives way to the future. The future is not known with ce..."

New page

{{Blog post
| title = Lex Futuri
| date = 2026-04-01
| authors = [[User:Arthur|Arthur]]
| image = Bartolomeu Velho 1568.jpg
| image_alt = Silicon chip under a microscope - Alexander Klepnev
| description = Infinite present, infinite futures, and the magnitudes of infinity
| keywords = Infinite_Journey; Infinist; Lex_Futuri; Ultraverse; Egonaut; Via
| mode = featured
}}The present gives way to the future.

The future is not known with certainty.

Even if the future of this moment in this reality is predetermined, there are many other possible futures that could have emerged from the substrate of a present like this.

All of these possible futures are infinite, but not all are equally likely and therefore of different magnitudes. I chose the word magnitude to describe this because many other terms currently used for such discussions didn't seem to encompass the concept well or had too much overlap.

The important point is that you will eventually experience all these futures and in the proportions by which they occur within the ultraverse. These proportions are something that we do not know and possibly will never know with certainty.

With single particles, we run into a similar dilemma as with the double-slit experiment. Through repeated trials we are able to discern the probabilities of different outcomes and from there the weights.

This is a similar problem: we have infinite presents that have infinite future outcomes but some outcomes are less frequent than others and thus the magnitudes differ.

With this concept in mind, one can be aware, to the extent a mind is capable, that there is a mosaic of possible futures that all occur. You will experience all of these possible futures eventually and all of them infinitely so but with varying degrees of magnitude or frequency.

And thus, '''Lex Futuri''': Latin for ''"Law of Future."''

''Note: This is not to say that all possible configurations exist in a manner we can experience. Two possible configurations for reality may be valid on their own from a physics viewpoint but having one unfold into the next in a Planck second may either be impossible or too unstable for any experiential existence to experience.

In other words, this does not mean that "anything that can happen will happen" but rather anything that does happen does happen and in the proportions by which it occurs in relation to all realities. It may be the case that "anything that can happen will happen" but that is not the assertion here.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 17 July 2026
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| authors = [[User:Arthur\|Arthur]]		\| authors = [[User:Arthur\|Arthur]]
	\| image = Bartolomeu Velho 1568.jpg		\| image = Bartolomeu Velho 1568.jpg
	\| image_alt = ~~Silicon chip under a microscope~~ - ~~Alexander Klepnev~~		\| image_alt = Figure of the heavenly bodies - Bartolomeu Velho (?-1568).
	\| description = Infinite present, infinite futures, and the magnitudes of infinity		\| description = Infinite present, infinite futures, and the magnitudes of infinity
	\| keywords = Infinite_Journey; Infinist; Lex_Futuri; Ultraverse; Egonaut; Via		\| keywords = Infinite_Journey; Infinist; Lex_Futuri; Ultraverse; Egonaut; Via
	\| mode = featured		\| mode = featured
	}}The present gives way to the future.		}}''The present gives way to the future.''

	The future is not known with certainty.		''The future is not known with certainty.''

	Even if the future of this moment in this reality is predetermined, there are many other possible futures that could have emerged from the substrate of a present like this.		Even if the future of this moment in this reality is predetermined, there are many other possible futures that could have emerged from the substrate of a present like this.

	All of these possible futures are infinite, but not all are equally likely and therefore of different magnitudes. I chose the word magnitude to describe this because many other terms currently used for such discussions didn't seem to encompass the concept well or ~~had too~~ much ~~overlap~~.		All of these possible futures are infinite, but not all are equally likely and therefore of different '''magnitudes'''. I chose the word magnitude to describe this because many other terms currently used for such discussions didn't seem to encompass the concept well or were used much more in adjacent discussions. You can also just think of frequencies or probability weights.

	The important point is that you will eventually experience all these futures and in the proportions by which they occur within the ultraverse. These proportions are something that we do not know and possibly will never know with certainty.		The important point is that you will eventually experience all these futures and in the proportions by which they occur within the [[Ultraverse\|ultraverse]]. These proportions are something that we do not know and possibly will never know with certainty.

	With single particles, we run into a similar dilemma as with the double-slit experiment. Through repeated trials we are able to discern the probabilities of different outcomes and from there the weights.		With single particles, we run into a similar dilemma as with the double-slit experiment. Through repeated trials we are able to discern the probabilities of different outcomes and from there the weights.
Line 26:		Line 26:
	And thus, '''Lex Futuri''': Latin for ''"Law of Future."''		And thus, '''Lex Futuri''': Latin for ''"Law of Future."''

	''Note: This is not to say that all possible configurations exist in a manner we can experience. Two possible configurations for reality may be valid on their own from a physics viewpoint but having one unfold into the next in a Planck second may either be impossible or too unstable for any experiential existence to experience.		''Note: This is not to say that all possible configurations exist in a manner we can experience. Two possible configurations for reality may be valid on their own from a physics viewpoint but having one unfold into the next in a Planck second may either be impossible or too unstable for any experiential existence to experience.''

	In other words, this does not mean that "anything that can happen will happen" but rather anything that does happen does happen and in the proportions by which it occurs in relation to all realities. It may be the case that "anything that can happen will happen" but that is not the assertion here.''		''In other words, this does not mean that "anything that can happen will happen" but rather anything that does happen does happen and in the proportions by which it occurs in relation to all realities. It may be the case that "anything that can happen will happen" but that is not the assertion here.''