Doctrina Ultra - Revision history

Root at 12:44, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T12:44:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 22 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Doctrina Ultra''', or “Doctrine of Beyond,” is at its core an interpretation of [[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]] which is the philosophical razor that:<blockquote>''advocates that when presented with competing hypotheses about the same prediction and both hypotheses have equal explanatory power, one should prefer the hypothesis that requires the fewest assumptions...''<ref>Ball, Philip (11 August 2016). "[https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/occams-razor/495332/ The Tyranny of Simple Explanations]". ''The Atlantic.'' [https://web.archive.org/web/20230202232303/https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/occams-razor/495332/ Archived] from the original on 2 February 2023. Retrieved 2 February 2023.</ref></blockquote>		'''Doctrina Ultra''', or ''“Doctrine of Beyond,”'' is at its core an interpretation of [[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]] which is the philosophical razor that:<blockquote>''advocates that when presented with competing hypotheses about the same prediction and both hypotheses have equal explanatory power, one should prefer the hypothesis that requires the fewest assumptions...''<ref>Ball, Philip (11 August 2016). "[https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/occams-razor/495332/ The Tyranny of Simple Explanations]". ''The Atlantic.'' [https://web.archive.org/web/20230202232303/https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/occams-razor/495332/ Archived] from the original on 2 February 2023. Retrieved 2 February 2023.</ref></blockquote>

	In essence, '''Doctrina Ultra''' suggests that the assumption of singularity for observed phenomenon inherently requires additional postulates to enforce this uniqueness and thus should not be logically preferred.		In essence, '''Doctrina Ultra''' suggests that the assumption of singularity for observed phenomenon inherently requires additional postulates to enforce this uniqueness and thus should not be logically preferred.

Root at 17:20, 9 September 2025

2025-09-09T17:20:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 9 September 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:
	#All necessary prerequisites for the its existence have been met and thus can be met.		#All necessary prerequisites for the its existence have been met and thus can be met.
	# It is inferred that reality is unable to prevent it from existing.		# It is inferred that reality is unable to prevent it from existing.
			# Thus, it can exist more than once.
	== Example: The Universe ==		== Example: The Universe ==
	A good example of '''Doctrina Ultra''' at play is with regard to the question of whether there is only one universe.		A good example of '''Doctrina Ultra''' at play is with regard to the question of whether there is only one universe.

Root at 17:17, 9 September 2025

2025-09-09T17:17:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 9 September 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Carried to its logical conclusion, this suggests it is reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon recurs infinitely.		Carried to its logical conclusion, this suggests it is reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon recurs infinitely.

	When applied to reality, '''Doctrina Ultra''' suggests that we should logically presume there are infinite universes, multiverses, and realities. This greater grand construct encompassing all ~~of reality~~ is termed the [[Ultraverse]].		When applied to reality, '''Doctrina Ultra''' suggests that we should logically presume there are infinite universes, multiverses, and realities. This greater grand construct encompassing all realities is termed the [[Ultraverse]].
	== See Also ==		== See Also ==
	{{seealso\|[[Ultraverse]]}}		{{seealso\|[[Ultraverse]]}}

	{{Seealsowiki\|[[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]]}}		{{Seealsowiki\|[[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]]}}

Root at 17:16, 9 September 2025

2025-09-09T17:16:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 9 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Doctrina Ultra''', or “Doctrine of Beyond,” is at its core an interpretation of [[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]].		'''Doctrina Ultra''', or “Doctrine of Beyond,” is at its core an interpretation of [[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]] which is the philosophical razor that:<blockquote>''advocates that when presented with competing hypotheses about the same prediction and both hypotheses have equal explanatory power, one should prefer the hypothesis that requires the fewest assumptions...''<ref>Ball, Philip (11 August 2016). "[https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/occams-razor/495332/ The Tyranny of Simple Explanations]". ''The Atlantic.'' [https://web.archive.org/web/20230202232303/https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/08/occams-razor/495332/ Archived] from the original on 2 February 2023. Retrieved 2 February 2023.</ref></blockquote>

			In essence, '''Doctrina Ultra''' suggests that the assumption of singularity for observed phenomenon inherently requires additional postulates to enforce this uniqueness and thus should not be logically preferred.

			Once we know that something has occurred at least once, asserting that it could only have occurred once requires a much stronger claim: it demands that we accept a thing’s existence while simultaneously denying the possibility that the conditions that allowed it to exist can occur.

	~~this~~ is a ~~logical chain of inference grounded in what we already know about reality and the universe~~: ~~it is reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon likely has existed or will exist on more occasions than it has been observed.~~		The logic here is that, given a thing exists:

	~~This may sound like a simple or even obvious idea --~~ and ~~in many ways, it~~ is~~. Once we know that something has occurred at least once, asserting~~ that it ~~could only have occurred once requires a much stronger claim~~. ~~It demands that we accept a thing’s existence while simultaneously denying~~ the ~~possibility that the conditions that allowed it to exist can occur~~.		#All necessary prerequisites for the its existence have been met and thus can be met.
			# It is inferred that reality is unable to prevent it from existing.
			== Example: The Universe ==
			A good example of '''Doctrina Ultra''' at play is with regard to the question of whether there is only one universe.

	~~To clarify~~, ~~Doctrina Ultra does not mean~~ that there are ~~more intelligent life forms in~~ the ~~universe than those found on Earth. Rather, it means that~~ we ~~should logically presume that there has been, is currently, or will eventually be more intelligent life forms than just us~~.		We know that the universe came into existence and is thus capable of coming into being, so the hypothesis that there are many universes only requires the postulates we already logical infer must have occurred.

	~~Doctrina Plus Ultra as a logical weight leaning us towards~~ the ~~infinite and eternal~~.		In contrast, the hypothesis that there is only one universe should logically require these same postulates but also additional postulates that eternally prevent what we already understand did occur from occurring more than once.

	~~----~~		== Infinite Implications ==

	~~This now brings us to Doctrina Plus Ultra, Latin for “Doctrine of Further Beyond.” In essence~~, ~~if we carry~~ Doctrina Ultra ~~to its logical conclusion,~~ it ~~becomes~~ reasonable to assume that ~~anything~~ observed ~~once recurs infinitely within the grand scheme of all things across all time~~.		Phrased differently, '''Doctrina Ultra''' suggests it is more reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon likely has existed (or will exist again) on more occasions than it has been observed.

	So, these doctrines lead to the presumption by Doctrina Ultra that more than one universe probably exists and further through Doctrina Plus Ultra that infinite universes are more likely than not. Let's give a name to this ~~greater construct which can be understood~~ to ~~encompass all universes and all possible realities across all possible times: The Ultraverse.~~		Carried to its logical conclusion, this suggests it is reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon recurs infinitely.

	~~----~~

	~~Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found~~ that prohibits time's emergence (despite time or whatever you define time as having already come to be), then it's reemergence should be understood as more likely than it's ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth across all possible realities and universes in the greater Ultraverse.

			When applied to reality, '''Doctrina Ultra''' suggests that we should logically presume there are infinite universes, multiverses, and realities. This greater grand construct encompassing all of reality is termed the [[Ultraverse]].
	== See Also ==		== See Also ==
	{{seealso\|}}		{{seealso\|[[Ultraverse]]}}

	{{Seealsowiki\|[[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]]}}		{{Seealsowiki\|[[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]]}}

Root at 16:18, 9 September 2025

2025-09-09T16:18:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 9 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~This brings us to~~ Doctrina Ultra, ~~Latin for~~ “Doctrine of Beyond.” At its core, this is a logical chain of inference grounded in what we already know about reality and the universe: it is reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon likely has existed or will exist on more occasions than it has been observed.		'''Doctrina Ultra''', or “Doctrine of Beyond,” is at its core an interpretation of [[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]].



			this is a logical chain of inference grounded in what we already know about reality and the universe: it is reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon likely has existed or will exist on more occasions than it has been observed.

	This may sound like a simple or even obvious idea -- and in many ways, it is. Once we know that something has occurred at least once, asserting that it could only have occurred once requires a much stronger claim. It demands that we accept a thing’s existence while simultaneously denying the possibility that the conditions that allowed it to exist can occur.		This may sound like a simple or even obvious idea -- and in many ways, it is. Once we know that something has occurred at least once, asserting that it could only have occurred once requires a much stronger claim. It demands that we accept a thing’s existence while simultaneously denying the possibility that the conditions that allowed it to exist can occur.

Root at 16:17, 9 September 2025

2025-09-09T16:17:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 9 September 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:
	{{seealso\|}}		{{seealso\|}}

	{{Seealsowiki\|}}		{{Seealsowiki\|[[wikipedia:Occam's razor\|Occam's razor]]}}

Root at 07:49, 9 September 2025

2025-09-09T07:49:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:49, 9 September 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	To clarify, Doctrina Ultra does not mean that there are more intelligent life forms in the universe than those found on Earth. Rather, it means that we should logically presume that there has been, is currently, or will eventually be more intelligent life forms than just us.		To clarify, Doctrina Ultra does not mean that there are more intelligent life forms in the universe than those found on Earth. Rather, it means that we should logically presume that there has been, is currently, or will eventually be more intelligent life forms than just us.

			Doctrina Plus Ultra as a logical weight leaning us towards the infinite and eternal.

			----

			This now brings us to Doctrina Plus Ultra, Latin for “Doctrine of Further Beyond.” In essence, if we carry Doctrina Ultra to its logical conclusion, it becomes reasonable to assume that anything observed once recurs infinitely within the grand scheme of all things across all time.

			So, these doctrines lead to the presumption by Doctrina Ultra that more than one universe probably exists and further through Doctrina Plus Ultra that infinite universes are more likely than not. Let's give a name to this greater construct which can be understood to encompass all universes and all possible realities across all possible times: The Ultraverse.

			----

			Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found that prohibits time's emergence (despite time or whatever you define time as having already come to be), then it's reemergence should be understood as more likely than it's ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth across all possible realities and universes in the greater Ultraverse.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Root at 19:08, 22 August 2025

2025-08-22T19:08:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 22 August 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	To clarify, Doctrina Ultra does not mean that there are more intelligent life forms in the universe than those found on Earth. Rather, it means that we should logically presume that there has been, is currently, or will eventually be more intelligent life forms than just us.		To clarify, Doctrina Ultra does not mean that there are more intelligent life forms in the universe than those found on Earth. Rather, it means that we should logically presume that there has been, is currently, or will eventually be more intelligent life forms than just us.

			== See Also ==
			{{seealso\|}}

			{{Seealsowiki\|}}

Root at 16:35, 22 August 2025

2025-08-22T16:35:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 22 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	...		This brings us to Doctrina Ultra, Latin for “Doctrine of Beyond.” At its core, this is a logical chain of inference grounded in what we already know about reality and the universe: it is reasonable to assume that any observed phenomenon likely has existed or will exist on more occasions than it has been observed.

			This may sound like a simple or even obvious idea -- and in many ways, it is. Once we know that something has occurred at least once, asserting that it could only have occurred once requires a much stronger claim. It demands that we accept a thing’s existence while simultaneously denying the possibility that the conditions that allowed it to exist can occur.

			To clarify, Doctrina Ultra does not mean that there are more intelligent life forms in the universe than those found on Earth. Rather, it means that we should logically presume that there has been, is currently, or will eventually be more intelligent life forms than just us.

Root: Created page with "..."

2025-08-22T12:04:57Z

Created page with "..."

New page

...