Verum Ex Logica - Revision history

Root at 17:34, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T17:34:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 22 September 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:
	'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.		'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.

	For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the person you recently saw whom you know to be homeless, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.		For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the person you recently saw whom you know to be homeless, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will ''eventually'' come to pass.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Root at 17:34, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T17:34:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 22 September 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:
	'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.		'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.

	For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as person you recently saw whom you know to be homeless, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.		For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the person you recently saw whom you know to be homeless, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Root at 17:33, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T17:33:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 22 September 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:
	'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.		'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.

	For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as ~~the homeless~~ person you saw ~~recently and~~ know to ~~actually~~ be homeless, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.		For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as person you recently saw whom you know to be homeless, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Root at 17:33, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T17:33:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 22 September 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:
	'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.		'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.

	For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the homeless person you saw recently, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.		For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the homeless person you saw recently and know to actually be homeless, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Root at 17:32, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T17:32:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 22 September 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:

	== Omnis Casus ==		== Omnis Casus ==
	'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all ~~truths~~ simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.		'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all possibilities simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.

	For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the homeless person you saw recently, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.		For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the homeless person you saw recently, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.

Root at 17:31, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T17:31:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 22 September 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:

	== Omnis Casus ==		== Omnis Casus ==
	'''Omnis Casus''' or "All Chances" is the concept of considering all truths simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.		'''Omnis Casus''' or ''"All Chances"'' is the concept of considering all truths simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.

	For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the homeless person you saw recently, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.		For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the homeless person you saw recently, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.

Root at 17:31, 22 September 2025

2025-09-22T17:31:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 22 September 2025
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found that prohibits universes from emerging (despite our universe's existence being powerful evidence against such postulates), then a multiplicity of emergence should be understood as more likely than a ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth.		Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found that prohibits universes from emerging (despite our universe's existence being powerful evidence against such postulates), then a multiplicity of emergence should be understood as more likely than a ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth.

			== Omnis Casus ==
			'''Omnis Casus''' or "All Chances" is the concept of considering all truths simultaneously such as with a distribution of probabilities.

			For example, you may expect an eternity will pass before you live as the homeless person you saw recently, but it [[Ego Divisus\|could also be tomorrow]]. Holding these probabilities simultaneously may spur more action than just the understanding that it will eventually come to pass.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Root at 13:57, 17 September 2025

2025-09-17T13:57:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 17 September 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:
	To clarify, this is not to say that infinite universes is empirical and absolutely certain. Rather, it is a [[Verum Ex Logica]] question which given [[Doctrina Ultra]] considerations leans us in favor that the phenomenon of universes arising has occurred more than once and probably infinitely across a greater [[Ultraverse]].		To clarify, this is not to say that infinite universes is empirical and absolutely certain. Rather, it is a [[Verum Ex Logica]] question which given [[Doctrina Ultra]] considerations leans us in favor that the phenomenon of universes arising has occurred more than once and probably infinitely across a greater [[Ultraverse]].

	Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found that prohibits universes from emerging (despite our universe's existence being powerful evidence against such postulates), then ~~it's reemergence~~ should be understood as more likely than ~~it's~~ ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth.		Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found that prohibits universes from emerging (despite our universe's existence being powerful evidence against such postulates), then a multiplicity of emergence should be understood as more likely than a ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==

Root at 13:55, 17 September 2025

2025-09-17T13:55:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 17 September 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== Historical Examples ==		== Historical Examples ==
	Questions and truth do not magically cease to exist simply because they evade robust empirical inquiry. In many cases throughout history, humans have thought the universe had to be one way because we couldn't see beyond our own horizon. This lack of empirical evidence didn't suddenly make the sun revolve around the Earth or the [[wikipedia:Milky Way\|Milky Way]] the sole galaxy in the cosmos.		Questions and truth do not magically cease to exist simply because they evade robust empirical inquiry. In many cases throughout history, [[wikipedia:human\|humans]] have thought the universe had to be one way because we couldn't see beyond our own horizon. This lack of empirical evidence didn't suddenly make the sun revolve around the Earth or the [[wikipedia:Milky Way\|Milky Way]] the sole galaxy in the cosmos.

	Take, for instance, [[wikipedia:Giordano Bruno\|Giordano Bruno]] (1548–1600) who proposed an infinite universe of innumerable worlds, suns, and possibly alien life. He also held some unorthodox theological views which in conjunction with his cosmological conjectures, led to his execution by burning in 1600 CE.		Take, for instance, [[wikipedia:Giordano Bruno\|Giordano Bruno]] (1548–1600) who proposed an infinite universe of innumerable worlds, suns, and possibly alien life. He also held some unorthodox theological views which in conjunction with his cosmological conjectures, led to his execution by burning in 1600 CE.

Root at 13:55, 17 September 2025

2025-09-17T13:55:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 17 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Verum Ex Logica]], Latin for ''"Truth From Logic"'', deals with questions that cannot be known ''yet'' with higher certainty via [[wikipedia:empirical evidence\|empirical evidence]]. Thus we are left with [[wikipedia:logic\|logic]] until [[wikipedia:science\|science]] reaches a point where such questions can be empirically addressed.		[[Verum Ex Logica]], Latin for ''"Truth From Logic"'', deals with questions that cannot be known ''yet'' with higher certainty via [[wikipedia:empirical evidence\|empirical evidence]]. Thus we are left with [[wikipedia:logic\|logic]] until [[wikipedia:science\|science]] reaches a point where such questions can be empirically addressed.

	~~Things that cannot be known yet with greater certainty using empirical methods, Ex Logica,~~ do not magically cease to exist. In many cases throughout history, we have thought the universe had to be one way because we couldn't see beyond our own horizon. This lack of empirical evidence didn't suddenly make the sun revolve around the Earth or the Milky Way the sole galaxy in the cosmos.		== Historical Examples ==
			Questions and truth do not magically cease to exist simply because they evade robust empirical inquiry. In many cases throughout history, humans have thought the universe had to be one way because we couldn't see beyond our own horizon. This lack of empirical evidence didn't suddenly make the sun revolve around the Earth or the [[wikipedia:Milky Way\|Milky Way]] the sole galaxy in the cosmos.

	Take, for instance, Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) who proposed an infinite universe of innumerable worlds, suns, and possibly alien life. He also held some unorthodox theological views which in conjunction with his cosmological conjectures, led to his execution by burning in 1600 CE.		Take, for instance, [[wikipedia:Giordano Bruno\|Giordano Bruno]] (1548–1600) who proposed an infinite universe of innumerable worlds, suns, and possibly alien life. He also held some unorthodox theological views which in conjunction with his cosmological conjectures, led to his execution by burning in 1600 CE.

	Immanuel Kant, the 18th-century German philosopher, built upon these ideas of Giordano Bruno to propose that the Milky Way was just one of many “island universes” or galaxies as we refer to them today. In 1920, Edwin Hubble provided conclusive observational evidence that the Andromeda “nebula” was in fact a separate galaxy. Today, the number of galaxies discovered is closer to 2 trillion.		[[wikipedia:Immanuel Kant\|Immanuel Kant]], the 18th-century German philosopher, built upon these ideas of Giordano Bruno to propose that the Milky Way was just one of many “island universes” or galaxies as we refer to them today. In 1920, [[wikipedia:Edwin Hubble\|Edwin Hubble]] provided conclusive observational evidence that the [[wikipedia:Andromeda Galaxy\|Andromeda]] “nebula” was in fact a separate galaxy. Today, the number of galaxies discovered is closer to 2 trillion.

	Prior to this empirical evidence, were all scholars that claimed there was only one galaxy wrong? Or were they right to conclude there was only one galaxy until concrete empirical evidence existed to prove there were more?		Prior to this empirical evidence, were all scholars that claimed there was only one galaxy wrong? Or were they right to conclude there was only one galaxy until concrete empirical evidence existed to prove there were more?

	This conundrum reflects the principle of epistemic humility: the idea that what we cannot yet observe may still exist. The fact that someone is “right” in hindsight does not necessarily mean their belief was justified at the time or that dismissing other possibilities was reasonable.		This conundrum reflects the principle of [[wikipedia:epistemic humility\|epistemic humility]]: the idea that what we cannot yet observe may still exist. The fact that someone is “right” in hindsight does not necessarily mean their belief was justified at the time or that dismissing other possibilities was reasonable.

	A modern example is the assertion that there is only one universe. Since we currently lack any means of detecting other universes, many scientists maintain that the only scientifically defensible position is to assume there is only one. Yet history reminds us that absence of evidence is not always evidence of absence.		== A Modern Example ==
			One modern example is the assertion that there is only one universe. Since we currently lack any means of detecting other universes, many scientists maintain that the only scientifically defensible position is to assume there is only one. Yet history reminds us that absence of evidence is not always evidence of absence.

	A better way to approach this uncertainty is by utilizing probabilities. We cannot say for certain whether there is one or many universes but we can use logic to constrain our probability ranges.		A better way to approach this uncertainty is by utilizing probabilities. We cannot say for certain whether there is one or many universes but we can use logic to constrain our probability ranges.

	Thus, this probabilistic knowledge as to if there is more than one universe should be placed in the Ex Logica category as attempts are made to find methods to empirically test it and therefore move it ~~to the Ex Scientia~~ category.		Thus, this probabilistic knowledge as to if there is more than one universe should be placed in the [[Verum Ex Logica]] category as attempts are made to find methods to empirically test it and therefore move it out of this category.

	~~----~~		== Clarifications ==
			To clarify, this is not to say that infinite universes is empirical and absolutely certain. Rather, it is a [[Verum Ex Logica]] question which given [[Doctrina Ultra]] considerations leans us in favor that the phenomenon of universes arising has occurred more than once and probably infinitely across a greater [[Ultraverse]].
	To clarify, this is not to say that ~~eternal time~~ is empirical and absolutely certain. Rather, it is an Ex Logica question which given Doctrina Ultra considerations ~~should lean~~ us ~~heavily~~ in favor that the phenomenon of ~~time~~ has occurred more than once across ~~the greater Ultraverse. When examined further through~~ a ~~Doctrina Plus Ultra lens, it is presumed likely that time is infinite in multitude and recurrence.~~

	Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found that prohibits time's emergence (despite time or whatever you define time as having already come to be), then it's reemergence should be understood as more likely than it's ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth across all possible realities and universes in the greater Ultraverse.

			Therefore, unless empirical evidence is found that prohibits universes from emerging (despite our universe's existence being powerful evidence against such postulates), then it's reemergence should be understood as more likely than it's ceaseless, never ending, and omnipresent dearth.

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==
	{{seealso\|}}		{{seealso\|[[Doctrina Ultra]], [[Ultraverse]]}}

	{{Seealsowiki\|[[wikipedia:empirical evidence\|Empirical Evidence]], [[wikipedia:logic\|Logic]], [[wikipedia:science\|Science]]}}		{{Seealsowiki\|[[wikipedia:empirical evidence\|Empirical Evidence]], [[wikipedia:logic\|Logic]], [[wikipedia:science\|Science]], [[wikipedia:epistemic humility\|Epistemic Humility]]}}